Skip to main content
HurlerSyndrome.org
Search

Governance policy

Editorial and evidence policy

Every page states what it is based on, when it was reviewed, and where the evidence ends. Clinical content is only marked approved by an assigned qualified human reviewer.

Regional applicability: Applies to the United Kingdom

Version and status

Version
1.0
Status
Owner-approved current version
Approved
Applies to
United Kingdom
Changes
Recorded in the correction log

Information about Hurler syndrome on this site is sourced from current specialist literature and guidance, assessed for evidence maturity, and then reviewed by a qualified human reviewer before it can be published as approved. Those are three separate steps and they are recorded separately, so it is always possible to see which of them a given page has been through.

Repetition across sources is not treated as corroboration. Where several pages of an earlier website said the same thing, that counts as one claim from one origin, not as independent agreement.

Why we do not name individuals

We publish the review process and the sources, not the names of the people who carry out the review. Editorial responsibility sits with MPS Bio as publisher, and accountability is stated by role. This applies to page content, metadata, structured data, downloads and release notes alike.

Assisted drafting

Software is used to structure, transform and check pages — to convert supplied material into the content model, to enforce the presentation and accessibility rules, and to run the automated gates. It is not used to originate a medical claim, and no automated step can move a page to approved. Approval is a human decision, recorded per page.